On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 01:04, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
>> Richi did not like it, you seem to be in favor, Michael neutral to in
>> favor.
>>
>> I tried finding an alternate place to put this information, such as
>> releases.html or svn.html, b
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 01:04, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Richi did not like it, you seem to be in favor, Michael neutral to in
> favor.
>
> I tried finding an alternate place to put this information, such as
> releases.html or svn.html, but none really work better. Shall we give
> Florian's patch a
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, Florian Weimer wrote:
>GCC 4.6 Stage 3 (starts 2010-11-03) \
> |v
> - | GCC 4.5.2 release (2010-12-16)
> + | r167945 GCC 4.5.2 release (2010-12-1
Hi,
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >> Uh, well - the information is readily available from SVN
> >
> > Hmm, you have a very unusual definition of "readily available" :)
>
> Well - of course svn sucks, but
>
> > svn log --stop-on-copy svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/ |
> > ta
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> > GCC 4.7 Stage 1 (starts 2011-03-14) GCC 4.6.0 release (2011-03-25)
>> > - |
>> > + | r171512
>> > |
>> > v
>> >
>> > The idea is to include the copy-s
Hi,
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > GCC 4.7 Stage 1 (starts 2011-03-14) GCC 4.6.0 release (2011-03-25)
> > - |
> > + | r171512
> > |
> > v
> >
> > The idea is to include the copy-source revision on the trunk or the
> > respective branch, so that y
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 07:15, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Would something like this be useful?
>>
>> --- develop.html.~1.114.~ 2011-03-26 10:44:52.0 +0100
>> +++ develop.html 2011-03-26 10:58:49.311173994 +0100
>> @@ -
* Richard Guenther:
>> The idea is to include the copy-source revision on the trunk or the
>> respective branch, so that you can use the timeline to check whether a
>> particular change came before or after a release. Of course, this is
>> just an approximation, but it think it might still be use
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Would something like this be useful?
>
> --- develop.html.~1.114.~ 2011-03-26 10:44:52.0 +0100
> +++ develop.html 2011-03-26 10:58:49.311173994 +0100
> @@ -434,13 +434,13 @@
> |
