On 12/01/11 15:39, Mike Stump wrote:
Makes this trivially true. In your patch, you alter the spelling of a test,
never do that. Once that is fixed, Ok.
Oh dear, I didn't mean to do that. Anyway, I decided to remove the visibility
tests here for the moment, so the scanasm change is moot and
On Nov 27, 2011, at 3:41 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
this patch extends scan-assembler (and scan-assembler-not) to allow
something like:
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "\\.hidden
\t__gcov___ZN1X4FinkEv" { target { ! *-*-darwin* } } { xfail *-*-
* } } } */
ok?
Almost... Every test that ca