Re: [pr 69666] No SRA default_def replacements for unscalarizable

2016-02-24 Thread Martin Jambor
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 06:45:08AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Martin Jambor wrote: > > Hi, > > > > in PR 69666, SRA attempts to turn a load from an aggregate that is > > uninitialized into a load from a default definition SSA name (which > > something it does to gener

Re: [pr 69666] No SRA default_def replacements for unscalarizable

2016-02-23 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > in PR 69666, SRA attempts to turn a load from an aggregate that is > uninitialized into a load from a default definition SSA name (which > something it does to generate an appropriate warning later) but > unfortunately it does so usin

Re: [pr 69666] No SRA default_def replacements for unscalarizable

2016-02-19 Thread Richard Biener
On February 19, 2016 5:21:56 PM GMT+01:00, Martin Jambor wrote: >Hi, > >in PR 69666, SRA attempts to turn a load from an aggregate that is >uninitialized into a load from a default definition SSA name (which >something it does to generate an appropriate warning later) but >unfortunately it does s