On 07/09/2018 03:56 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/09/2018 01:19 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
I'd like decisions about how to expand branches deferred until rtl
expansion. Kai was poking at this in the past but never really got any
traction.
For the record, the problem in this testcase is that sw
On 07/09/2018 01:19 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>>
>> I'd like decisions about how to expand branches deferred until rtl
>> expansion. Kai was poking at this in the past but never really got any
>> traction.
>
> For the record, the problem in this testcase is that switch lowering is
> riddled with
On 07/09/2018 04:29 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:19 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 07/05/2018 03:27 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/04/2018 02:12 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Many tests should turn into gimple IL tests.
Yeah, though for tests like the threading ones, they'
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:19 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
>
>
> On 07/05/2018 03:27 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 07/04/2018 02:12 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 07/03/2018 08:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>> On 07/03/2018 03:31 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On 07/02/2018 07:08 AM, Christoph
On 07/05/2018 03:27 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/04/2018 02:12 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 07/03/2018 08:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/03/2018 03:31 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 07/02/2018 07:08 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 11/07/2017 10:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
While poking around i
On 07/04/2018 02:12 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
>
> On 07/03/2018 08:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 07/03/2018 03:31 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>>> On 07/02/2018 07:08 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>>
>> On 11/07/2017 10:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>>> While poking around in the backwards thr
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 10:12 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
>
>
> On 07/03/2018 08:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 07/03/2018 03:31 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >> On 07/02/2018 07:08 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >>
> > On 11/07/2017 10:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >> While poking around in the
On 07/03/2018 08:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/03/2018 03:31 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 07/02/2018 07:08 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 11/07/2017 10:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
While poking around in the backwards threader I noticed that we bail if
we have already seen a starting BB.
On 07/03/2018 03:31 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On 07/02/2018 07:08 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
On 11/07/2017 10:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> While poking around in the backwards threader I noticed that we bail if
>
> we have already seen a starting BB.
>
> /* D
On 07/02/2018 07:08 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 11/07/2017 10:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
While poking around in the backwards threader I noticed that we bail if
we have already seen a starting BB.
/* Do not jump-thread twice from the same block. */
if (bitmap_bit_p (thread
On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 at 12:56, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
>
>
> On 06/29/2018 02:50 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> > [ Returning to another old patch... ]
> >
> > On 11/07/2017 10:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >> [One more time, but without rejected HTML mail, because apparently this
> >> is my first post to g
On 06/29/2018 02:50 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
[ Returning to another old patch... ]
On 11/07/2017 10:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
[One more time, but without rejected HTML mail, because apparently this
is my first post to gcc-patches *ever* ;-)].
Howdy!
While poking around in the backwards threa
[ Returning to another old patch... ]
On 11/07/2017 10:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> [One more time, but without rejected HTML mail, because apparently this
> is my first post to gcc-patches *ever* ;-)].
>
> Howdy!
>
> While poking around in the backwards threader I noticed that we bail if
> we
On 11/29/2017 11:49 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On 11/27/2017 06:27 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 11/07/2017 10:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
>>> Without further ado, here are my monumental, earth shattering
>>> improvements:
>>>
>>> Conditional branches
>>> Without patch: 411846839709
>>> Wi
On 11/27/2017 06:27 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/07/2017 10:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Without further ado, here are my monumental, earth shattering improvements:
Conditional branches
Without patch: 411846839709
With patch: 411831330316
%changed: -0.0037660%
Number of inst
On 11/07/2017 10:33 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> [One more time, but without rejected HTML mail, because apparently this
> is my first post to gcc-patches *ever* ;-)].
>
> Howdy!
>
> While poking around in the backwards threader I noticed that we bail if
> we have already seen a starting BB.
>
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
