On Thu, 19 Oct 2017, Janus Weil wrote:
> Ping!
>
> Is there any hope to get this 3-year-old patch to trunk after all? (It
> seems there was at least a review of the Fortran parts, which has not
> seen a reply ...)
I'm not clear here what the semantics of -static-libquadmath are meant to
be with
Ping!
Is there any hope to get this 3-year-old patch to trunk after all? (It
seems there was at least a review of the Fortran parts, which has not
seen a reply ...)
Cheers,
Janus
2014-10-15 8:49 GMT+02:00 FX :
> ping
>
> Patch needs:
> - C/driver options maintainer, or global reviewer, to OK
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, FX wrote:
> I sent my last “driver/options” patch to Neil Booth, listed as “option
> handling” maintainer, but the email bounced back from his
> daikokuya.co.uk address. Given that he did not commit to the tree since
> January 2005 (almost 10 years), and that his last commit
FX wrote:
> Patch needs:
> - C/driver options maintainer, or global reviewer, to OK the C changes
> (outside darwin). They are really simple
> - Fortran maintainer to OK the Fortran part
[...]
> >> We have a -static-libgfortran option, but on targets where we support
> >> quad-prec math throu
ping
Patch needs:
- C/driver options maintainer, or global reviewer, to OK the C changes
(outside darwin). They are really simple
- Fortran maintainer to OK the Fortran part
> Version 2 of the patch, now handling the darwin case (thanks Iain) and
> expressely noting in the documentation th
On Oct 9, 2014, at 3:39 AM, FX wrote:
> Version 2 of the patch, now handling the darwin case (thanks Iain)
> OK to commit?
For the bits I can approve, Ok.
> But it still needs to be OK'd by either a global reviewer or one of the
> listed Darwin maintainers ;) ...
> ... (ccing Mike)
Duh me. I thought you were a darwin maintainer. Sorry.
FX
Hi FX,
On 9 Oct 2014, at 11:39, FX wrote:
> Version 2 of the patch, now handling the darwin case (thanks Iain) and
> expressely noting in the documentation the implications on redistribution
> (thanks Joseph).
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-apple-darwin14.
>
> OK to commit?
>
> I need
Version 2 of the patch, now handling the darwin case (thanks Iain) and
expressely noting in the documentation the implications on redistribution
(thanks Joseph).
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-apple-darwin14.
OK to commit?
I need a C/driver options maintainer, or global reviewer, to OK th
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 08:38:14PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > Since -static-libquadmath introduces LGPL requirements on redistributing
> > the resulting binaries (that you provide source or relinkable object files
> > to allow relinking with modifi
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 08:38:14PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Since -static-libquadmath introduces LGPL requirements on redistributing
> the resulting binaries (that you provide source or relinkable object files
> to allow relinking with modified versions of libquadmath) that don't
> otherw
Since -static-libquadmath introduces LGPL requirements on redistributing
the resulting binaries (that you provide source or relinkable object files
to allow relinking with modified versions of libquadmath) that don't
otherwise generally apply simply through using GCC to build a program even
if
Hi FX,
On 4 Oct 2014, at 14:51, FX wrote:
> We have a -static-libgfortran option, but on targets where we support
> quad-prec math through libquadmath, we didn’t have an equivalent
> -static-libquadmath so far. This patch adds it, in what I think is a rather
> straightforward manner.
>
> The
13 matches
Mail list logo
