On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 22:48 +0100, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 20:38 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > Make sure that you do need each #include present in this and any other new
> > file. Since 2008 a lot of includes of tm.h and toplev.h have been removed
> > and diagnostic-cor
On 11/06/11 07:28, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 22:48 +0100, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 20:38 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Make sure that you do need each #include present in this and any other new
file. Since 2008 a lot of includes of tm.h and toplev.h have be
On 11/04/2011 02:48 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> Removed unnecessary includes.
>
> * trans-mem.c: Removed unnecessary includes.
Ok.
r~
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 20:38 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > Make sure that you do need each #include present in this and any other new
> > file. Since 2008 a lot of includes of tm.h and toplev.h have been removed
> > and diagnostic-core.h introduced
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 20:38 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> Make sure that you do need each #include present in this and any other new
> file. Since 2008 a lot of includes of tm.h and toplev.h have been removed
> and diagnostic-core.h introduced as an alternative to diagnostic.h for
> many user
Make sure that you do need each #include present in this and any other new
file. Since 2008 a lot of includes of tm.h and toplev.h have been removed
and diagnostic-core.h introduced as an alternative to diagnostic.h for
many users. If tm.h is needed, it's good to have a comment on the
#includ
