On 5/19/23 02:49, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Subject:
Re: [patch,avr] Fix PR109650 wrong code
From:
Georg-Johann Lay
Date:
5/19/23, 02:49
To:
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
CC:
Jeff Law , Denis Chertykov ,
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
...Ok, and now with the patch attached...
Here is a revised
...Ok, and now with the patch attached...
Here is a revised version of the patch. The difference to the
previous one is that it adds some combine patterns for *cbranch
insns that were lost in the PR92729 transition. The post-reload
part of the patterns were still there. The new patterns are
sl
Here is a revised version of the patch. The difference to the
previous one is that it adds some combine patterns for *cbranch
insns that were lost in the PR92729 transition. The post-reload
part of the patterns were still there. The new patterns are
slightly more general in that they also handl
