> Thanks everyone for the comments and review.
> Committed as r217366
I cannot push the change to binutils-gdb as I don’t have write access there.
Also, Joseph Myers said I needed to commit to newlib/libgloss, but their
webpage only mentions read-only CVS.
Could someone do it for me?
Thanks,
FX
On Nov 11, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> The only problem with this fix for the broken libtool.m4 is that
> it will require constant tending as other patches regenerate these
> various configure files. For example,
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2014-11/msg00379.html which was jus
> Totally agree with Mike here. If you look at the patch it's clear it's just
> hitting Darwin and it's absolutely safe.
Thanks everyone for the comments and review.
Committed as r217366
FX
Hi Jack,
> The only problem with this fix for the broken libtool.m4 is that
> it will require constant tending as other patches regenerate these
> various configure files.
As I explained in an earlier email today, you are mistaken about the patch. It
does fix libtool.m4, which means that all fur
Mike,
The only problem with this fix for the broken libtool.m4 is that
it will require constant tending as other patches regenerate these
various configure files. For example,
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2014-11/msg00379.html which was just
committed would have removed the proposed change h
On 11/11/14 12:38, Mike Stump wrote:
2014-11-11 Francois-Xavier Coudert
PR target/63610 * configure:
Missing Regenerate.
OK to commit?
Ok.
This touches so many area it probably needs a build maintainer or
global maintainer to approve it.
Only darwin is affected, and unlikely anyone e
On Nov 11, 2014, at 11:06 AM, FX wrote:
> Here’s v2 of the patch
> OK to commit?
Ok with comments:
libvtv:
libvtv/
2014-11-11 Francois-Xavier Coudert
PR target/63610
* configure:
Missing Regenerate.
> OK to commit?
Ok.
> This touches so many area it probably needs a bu
