Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 66089, ICE (plus wrong code) in dependency handling

Hi Thomas, > Anything else? … Yes, the tests gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 and gfortran.dg/no_arg_check_2.f90 fail: FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original "sub_array_assumed (D" 3 (found 4 times) FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O scan-tree-dump

Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 66089, ICE (plus wrong code) in dependency handling

Am 08.03.19 um 08:04 schrieb Bernhard Reutner-Fischer: Please change call abort to stop N in the test? Done. Anything else? OK for trunk? Regards Thomas

Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 66089, ICE (plus wrong code) in dependency handling

On 6 March 2019 19:49:59 CET, Thomas Koenig wrote: >Hello world, > >the attached patch fixes a 7/8/9 regression where dependency checking >was for class arrays and a scalar value was mishandled when the >dependency happened in an elemental function. > >There was an ICE for the test case which is h