that's right. but there is no way to predict the pattern.
what I meant was as far as it does not introduce major slow-down in
dumping profile, I'd like to use the simpler version.
what do you think?
-Rong
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> It depends on the value distr
It depends on the value distribution .
David
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Rong Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Rong Xu wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:04 PM, wrote:
>>> The change in gcov-io.h is from a different patch.
>>
>> sorry. here is the patch for gcov-io.h:
>>
>
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Rong Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:04 PM, wrote:
>> The change in gcov-io.h is from a different patch.
>
> sorry. here is the patch for gcov-io.h:
>
> Index: gcov-io.h
> ===
> --- gcov-io.h
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:04 PM, wrote:
> The change in gcov-io.h is from a different patch.
sorry. here is the patch for gcov-io.h:
Index: gcov-io.h
===
--- gcov-io.h (revision 194562)
+++ gcov-io.h (working copy)
@@ -781,8 +7
The change in gcov-io.h is from a different patch.
David
https://codereview.appspot.com/6968046/diff/1/gcc/gcov-io.c
File gcc/gcov-io.c (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/6968046/diff/1/gcc/gcov-io.c#newcode688
gcc/gcov-io.c:688:
Have you compared this with this impl:
while (x)
{
c++;
