On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:29:45PM +0100, FX wrote:
> > Thinking out loud here. I wonder, however, if we want
> > to future proof the library against changes to the
> > options passed by having a few spare unused entried
> > available. This of course only helps if a new option
> > needs to be ad
> Thinking out loud here. I wonder, however, if we want
> to future proof the library against changes to the
> options passed by having a few spare unused entried
> available. This of course only helps if a new option
> needs to be added. It does nothing for removal.
That’s actually the way gf
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:47:09PM +0100, FX wrote:
> For ABI compatibility, we kept some unused elements in the array argument to
> _gfortran_set_options (options that we have removed). With the current ABI
> breakage, we might as well remove those.
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-appl
