Re: [cxx-conversion] graphite-related hash tables

2012-12-03 Thread Diego Novillo
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote: > Assuming the test suite passes and this is just a no-behavior change > intended commit, I am fine with this. No idea, who needs to sign off > branch commits, though. The branch is under the usual maintainer rules (it's a regular development

Re: [cxx-conversion] graphite-related hash tables

2012-12-02 Thread Tobias Grosser
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012, at 02:42 AM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: > Change graphite-related hash tables from htab_t to hash_table: > > graphite-clast-to-gimple.c ivs_params::newivs_index > graphite-clast-to-gimple.c ivs_params::params_index > graphite-clast-to-gimple.c print_generated_program::params_index