Re: [aarch64] PR102376 - Emit better diagnostic for arch extensions in target attr

On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 20:27, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: > > On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 14:19, Richard Sandiford > > wrote: > >> > >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: > >> > On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 15:05, Richard Sandiford > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni wr

Re: [aarch64] PR102376 - Emit better diagnostic for arch extensions in target attr

Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: > On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 14:19, Richard Sandiford > wrote: >> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: >> > On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 15:05, Richard Sandiford >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: >> >> > On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 at 19:58, Richard Sandiford >> >> > wrot

Re: [aarch64] PR102376 - Emit better diagnostic for arch extensions in target attr

On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 14:19, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: > > On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 15:05, Richard Sandiford > > wrote: > >> > >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: > >> > On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 at 19:58, Richard Sandiford > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni w

Re: [aarch64] PR102376 - Emit better diagnostic for arch extensions in target attr

Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: > On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 15:05, Richard Sandiford > wrote: >> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: >> > On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 at 19:58, Richard Sandiford >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > The attached patch emits a more verbose diagnost

Re: [aarch64] PR102376 - Emit better diagnostic for arch extensions in target attr

On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 at 21:33, Martin Sebor wrote: > > On 10/28/21 2:59 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 14:41, Prathamesh Kulkarni > > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 15:05, Richard Sandiford > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: >

Re: [aarch64] PR102376 - Emit better diagnostic for arch extensions in target attr

On 10/28/21 2:59 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches wrote: On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 14:41, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 15:05, Richard Sandiford wrote: Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 at 19:58, Richard Sandiford wrote: Prathamesh Kulkarni writes

Re: [aarch64] PR102376 - Emit better diagnostic for arch extensions in target attr

On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 14:41, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 15:05, Richard Sandiford > wrote: > > > > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: > > > On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 at 19:58, Richard Sandiford > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: > > >> > Hi, > > >> > The attac

Re: [aarch64] PR102376 - Emit better diagnostic for arch extensions in target attr

On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 15:05, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: > > On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 at 19:58, Richard Sandiford > > wrote: > >> > >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: > >> > Hi, > >> > The attached patch emits a more verbose diagnostic for target attribute > >> > that > >>

Re: [aarch64] PR102376 - Emit better diagnostic for arch extensions in target attr

Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: > On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 at 19:58, Richard Sandiford > wrote: >> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: >> > Hi, >> > The attached patch emits a more verbose diagnostic for target attribute >> > that >> > is an architecture extension needing a leading '+'. >> > >> > For the fol

Re: [aarch64] PR102376 - Emit better diagnostic for arch extensions in target attr

On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 at 19:58, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: > > Hi, > > The attached patch emits a more verbose diagnostic for target attribute that > > is an architecture extension needing a leading '+'. > > > > For the following test, > > void calculate(void) __attrib

Re: [aarch64] PR102376 - Emit better diagnostic for arch extensions in target attr

Prathamesh Kulkarni writes: > Hi, > The attached patch emits a more verbose diagnostic for target attribute that > is an architecture extension needing a leading '+'. > > For the following test, > void calculate(void) __attribute__ ((__target__ ("sve"))); > > With patch, the compiler now emits: >