Re: [RX] Add support for atomic operations

2016-05-31 Thread Oleg Endo
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 14:17 +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > > Sorry, but my original patch was buggy. There are two problems: > > Thanks for your diligence in checking the patch. Just eating my own dogfood here ... :) > Approved - please apply. Committed as r236926. Cheers, Oleg

Re: [RX] Add support for atomic operations

2016-05-31 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Oleg, > Sorry, but my original patch was buggy. There are two problems: Thanks for your diligence in checking the patch. > The attached patch fixes those issues. > OK for trunk? > > Cheers, > Oleg > > gcc/ChangeLog: > * config/rx/rx.md (FETCHOP_NO_MINUS): New code iterator. > (

Re: [RX] Add support for atomic operations

2016-05-28 Thread Oleg Endo
On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 15:18 +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * config/rx/rx-protos.h (is_interrupt_func, > > is_fast_interrupt_func): > > Forward declare. > > (rx_atomic_sequence): New class. > > * config/rx/rx.c (rx_print_operand): Use symbolic names for PSW > > b

Re: [RX] Add support for atomic operations

2016-05-09 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Oleg, > gcc/ChangeLog: > * config/rx/rx-protos.h (is_interrupt_func, is_fast_interrupt_func): > Forward declare. > (rx_atomic_sequence): New class. > * config/rx/rx.c (rx_print_operand): Use symbolic names for PSW bits. > (is_interrupt_func, is_fast_interrupt_func)