On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 4:33 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 15:06 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Tom de Vries
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 12/11/15 13:26, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >>>
>> >
On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 15:06 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Tom de Vries
> > wrote:
> >> On 12/11/15 13:26, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Tom de Vries
> >>> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> On 12/11/15 13:26, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Tom de Vries
>>> wrote:
Hi,
[ See also related discussion at
https://gcc.gn
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 12/11/15 13:26, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Tom de Vries
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> [ See also related discussion at
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07/msg00452.html ]
>>>
>>> this patch rem
On 12/11/15 13:26, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
[ See also related discussion at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07/msg00452.html ]
this patch removes the usage of first_pass_instance from pass_vrp.
the patch:
- limits itself to pass
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [ See also related discussion at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07/msg00452.html ]
>
> this patch removes the usage of first_pass_instance from pass_vrp.
>
> the patch:
> - limits itself to pass_vrp, but my intention is to