> I have 4 regressions in the C testsuite with -mflat on SPARC/Solaris:
And 2 regressions in 64-bit mode:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/nestfunc-6.c execution, -O1
[...]
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/nested-6.c -O1 execution test
[...]
Another latent problem exposed by the change. Tested o
> I tried to figure out why things had been done in this
> slightly convoluted manner and failed. It seems to me that
> this is easily represented with the individual instructions.
> A comment indicated that there had been problems with the
> copy to %o7 being deleted. Elsewhere we have successfu
> I tried to figure out why things had been done in this
> slightly convoluted manner and failed. It seems to me that
> this is easily represented with the individual instructions.
I wanted to avoid the back-and-forth game on the CFA offset and emit the same
CFIs as in the normal case. Your sol
On 06/20/2011 05:33 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> The current code generation for -mflat uses 3 insn patterns
> which emit up two three insns (sort of) emulating the save
Lest I get sent back for remedial English, that was supposed
to be "emit two or three" but fingers got ahead of brain.
r~
