On 07/16/2018 05:10 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 07/16/2018 03:50 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>> Any comments?
>>
>> Interesting idea. I wonder if that should be generalized
>> to other places
>
> I kept the option name general, to allow for that.
>
> A
On Jul 16, 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 07/16/2018 03:34 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> So is this essentially a workaround for GDB not supporting the statement
>> frontiers?
> AFAIU now, the concept of location views addresses this problem, so yes.
Nice! A preview for what can be obtained with
On 07/16/2018 03:50 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is an idea that I'm currently playing around with: adding nops in
>> an optimized application with debug info can improve the debug info.
>>
>>
>> Consider f.i. this gdb session in foo of p
On 07/16/2018 03:34 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 03:29:10PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> this is an idea that I'm currently playing around with: adding nops in
>> an optimized application with debug info can improve the debug info.
>>
>> Consider f.i. this gdb session in foo
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is an idea that I'm currently playing around with: adding nops in
> an optimized application with debug info can improve the debug info.
>
>
> Consider f.i. this gdb session in foo of pr54200-2.c (using -Os):
> ...
> (gdb) n
> 26
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 03:29:10PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> this is an idea that I'm currently playing around with: adding nops in
> an optimized application with debug info can improve the debug info.
>
> Consider f.i. this gdb session in foo of pr54200-2.c (using -Os):
> ...
> (gdb) n
> 26
