Re: [RFA 3/8] validate_failures.py: pass options.results for clean build case

2012-11-28 Thread Diego Novillo
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Doug Evans wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: >> >> Am I right in understanding that you are intending to call >> >> $ validate_failures.py --clean_build=/path/to/gdb/bld >> --manifest=/path/to/gdb.sum ? >> >> If that's not what you ar

Re: [RFA 3/8] validate_failures.py: pass options.results for clean build case

2012-11-28 Thread Doug Evans
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Doug Evans wrote: > >> In gdb-land, parallel make check runs collect all the subdirectory >> .sum files and reconstruct testsuite/${tool}.sum. >> >> There's more than one solution of course: alternatively on

Re: [RFA 3/8] validate_failures.py: pass options.results for clean build case

2012-11-28 Thread Diego Novillo
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Doug Evans wrote: > In gdb-land, parallel make check runs collect all the subdirectory > .sum files and reconstruct testsuite/${tool}.sum. > > There's more than one solution of course: alternatively one could have > gdb stop doing this. But I'm not sure which is

Re: [RFA 3/8] validate_failures.py: pass options.results for clean build case

2012-11-28 Thread Doug Evans
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Diego Novillo wrote: > On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Doug Evans wrote: >> >> Hi. >> This third patch passes options.results to GetSumFiles when fetching the >> results >> for the clean build. >> It is useful in my use cases, but I'm not sure it's useful for ups

Re: [RFA 3/8] validate_failures.py: pass options.results for clean build case

2012-11-25 Thread Diego Novillo
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Doug Evans wrote: > > Hi. > This third patch passes options.results to GetSumFiles when fetching the > results > for the clean build. > It is useful in my use cases, but I'm not sure it's useful for upstream. > [An alternative is to add another option to specify th