On 2014-06-16, 12:14 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
Any reason the check couldn't be like the earlier patch ?
i.e. else if (targetm.spill_class)
{
}
I've just preferred to put most conditions in one place. That is the
on
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> On 2014-06-16, 11:05 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This handles NULL targetm.spill_class in assign_by_spills. This
>> showed up as a segfault during a build for arm-none-linux-gnueabi(hf).
>>
>> Fix pre-approved by r
On 2014-06-16, 11:05 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
Hi,
This handles NULL targetm.spill_class in assign_by_spills. This
showed up as a segfault during a build for arm-none-linux-gnueabi(hf).
Fix pre-approved by richi on IRC , verified that bootstrap continues
from where things broke furth
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 04:05:52PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> This handles NULL targetm.spill_class in assign_by_spills. This showed
> up
> as a segfault during a build for arm-none-linux-gnueabi(hf).
>
> Fix pre-approved by richi on IRC , verified that bootstrap continues from
>
