On 29 May 2012 18:30, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 05/26/2012 01:27 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i< nelt; i += diff)
>> + for (i = 0; i< nelt ; i += (diff + 1))
>> for (j = 0; j<= diff; j += 1)
>> - if (d->perm[i + j] != i + diff - j)
>> - return false;
On 05/26/2012 01:27 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
- for (i = 0; i< nelt; i += diff)
+ for (i = 0; i< nelt ; i += (diff + 1))
for (j = 0; j<= diff; j += 1)
- if (d->perm[i + j] != i + diff - j)
- return false;
+ {
+ /* This is guaranteed to be true as the value of