On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:31:54PM +, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:42:06AM +, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> > Hi James,
> >
> > I think you have a bug in the following hunk where you pass
> > STORE_MAX_PIECES in place of the optimise for speed flag. I guess you
> > would
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:42:06AM +, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> I think you have a bug in the following hunk where you pass
> STORE_MAX_PIECES in place of the optimise for speed flag. I guess you
> would need an extra argument to pass a different *_MAX_PIECES value
> in.
Yup, goo
Hi James,
I think you have a bug in the following hunk where you pass
STORE_MAX_PIECES in place of the optimise for speed flag. I guess you
would need an extra argument to pass a different *_MAX_PIECES value
in.
thanks,
Matthew
>@@ -192,8 +184,7 @@ static void write_complex_part (rtx, rtx, bool)
