On 08/14/2012 11:57 AM, Mikael Morin wrote:
On 14/08/2012 11:33, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Thus, I removed ST_LABEL_ENDDO_TARGET, use "=type" and added a comment,
but I didn't do the verify_st_order change.
Build and regested on x86-64-linux.
OK for the trunk?
OK, apart for:
* gfortran.dg/
On 14/08/2012 11:33, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Thus, I removed ST_LABEL_ENDDO_TARGET, use "=type" and added a comment,
> but I didn't do the verify_st_order change.
>
> Build and regested on x86-64-linux.
> OK for the trunk?
>
OK, apart for:
* gfortran.dg/data_constraints_1.f90: Update dg-w
On 08/09/2012 02:13 PM, Mikael Morin wrote:
On 08/08/2012 19:12, Tobias Burnus wrote:
With this patch, I think the only unimplemented obsolescence warning is for
"(8) Fixed form source -- see B.2.7."
For the latter, I would like to see a possibility to silence that
warning, given that there is
On 08/08/2012 19:12, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> With this patch, I think the only unimplemented obsolescence warning is for
> "(8) Fixed form source -- see B.2.7."
>
> For the latter, I would like to see a possibility to silence that
> warning, given that there is substantial code around, which is in
