Hi Tobias,
In conclusion: I am fine with the FORALL part, but not with the
DO CONCURRENT part.
Yep, you're right. I have modified the patch accordingly. Here
is what I committed.
Best regards
Thomas
Index: fortran/ChangeLog
==
Hi Thomas,
> the attached patch fixes the PR by removing common function elimination
> in FORALL statements.
I think that part is OK. However, you do more - you also avoid the handling
for DO CONCURRENT.
However, I do not see why it could fail for DO CONCURRENT or rather: I do
not see a case whe
