Re: [PING][PATCH] GCC/test: Set timeout factor for c11-atomic-exec-5.c

2014-10-21 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
David, > >> > I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would > >> > be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I > >> > see > >> > r216437 went without it. In that case would someone please review my > >> > proposal as a separate change? > >> >

Re: [PING][PATCH] GCC/test: Set timeout factor for c11-atomic-exec-5.c

2014-10-20 Thread David Edelsohn
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, David Edelsohn wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would >> > be folded into PowerPC TARGET_AT

Re: [PING][PATCH] GCC/test: Set timeout factor for c11-atomic-exec-5.c

2014-10-20 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would > > be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I see > > r216437 went withou

Re: [PING][PATCH] GCC/test: Set timeout factor for c11-atomic-exec-5.c

2014-10-20 Thread David Edelsohn
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Hi, > > I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would > be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I see > r216437 went without it. In that case would someone please review my > propo