on 2021/9/10 上午11:22, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi Segher and Bill,
>
> Thanks a lot for your reviews and helps!
>
> on 2021/9/10 上午1:19, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>> On 9/9/21 11:11 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 02:57:14PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>>
Hi Segher and Bill,
Thanks a lot for your reviews and helps!
on 2021/9/10 上午1:19, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> On 9/9/21 11:11 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 02:57:14PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> + /* If we have strided or elementwise loads into a vector, it's
Hi!
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 12:19:28PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> On 9/9/21 11:11 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 02:57:14PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> >>+ /* If we have strided or elementwise loads into a vector, it's
> >"strided" is not a word: it properly is "stri
On 9/9/21 12:19 PM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
On 9/9/21 11:11 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 02:57:14PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
+ /* If we have strided or elementwise loads into a vector, it's
+possible to be bounded by latency and execution resources for
+
On 9/9/21 11:11 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 02:57:14PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
+ /* If we have strided or elementwise loads into a vector, it's
+possible to be bounded by latency and execution resources for
+many scalar loads. Try to account f
Hi!
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 02:57:14PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> >>+ /* If we have strided or elementwise loads into a vector, it's
> >>+possible to be bounded by latency and execution resources for
> >>+many scalar loads. Try to account for this by scaling the
> >>+construction
on 2021/9/8 下午2:57, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> Thanks for the review comments!
>
> on 2021/9/3 下午11:57, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi Kewen,
>>
>> Sorry that we lost track of this patch! The heuristic approach looks good.
>> It is limited in scope and won't kick in often, and
