Hi Thomas,
on 2021/7/30 下午3:18, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for this nice clean-up.
>
> Curious why in some instances we're not removing the 'class loop *loop'
> declaration, I had a look, and this may suggest some further clean-up?
> (See below; so far, all untested!)
>
>
Yeah, s
Hi!
Thanks for this nice clean-up.
Curious why in some instances we're not removing the 'class loop *loop'
declaration, I had a look, and this may suggest some further clean-up?
(See below; so far, all untested!)
But first, is this transformation correct?
> --- a/gcc/tree-cfg.c
> +++ b/gcc/tre
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 4:11 AM Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
> on 2021/7/24 上午12:10, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 7/23/21 2:35 AM, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Comparing to v2, this v3 removed the new CTOR with struct loops *loops
> >> as Richi clarified. I'd like to support it in a separated follow u
