On 11/28/18 1:51 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 05:07:11PM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
>> perf diff -c wdiff:1,1 shows, that there is just one function
>> (htab_traverse) that is significantly slower now:
>>
>> 2.98% 11768891764 exe[.]
Hi!
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 05:07:11PM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> perf diff -c wdiff:1,1 shows, that there is just one function
> (htab_traverse) that is significantly slower now:
>
> 2.98% 11768891764 exe[.] htab_traverse
> 1.91% 563949986 exe
> Am 26.11.2018 um 16:26 schrieb Ilya Leoshkevich :
>
>> Am 26.11.2018 um 16:07 schrieb Segher Boessenkool
>> :
>>
>>> # ppc64le-redhat-linux:
>>> 511.povray_r -1.29%
>>> 482.sphinx3-0.65%
>>> 456.hmmer -0.53%
>>> 519.lbm_r -0.51%
>>> # skip |dt| < 0.5%
>>> 549.fo
> Am 26.11.2018 um 16:07 schrieb Segher Boessenkool
> :
>
>> # ppc64le-redhat-linux:
>> 511.povray_r -1.29%
>> 482.sphinx3-0.65%
>> 456.hmmer -0.53%
>> 519.lbm_r -0.51%
>> # skip |dt| < 0.5%
>> 549.fotonik3d_r+1.13%
>> 403.gcc+1.76%
>> 500.perlbench
Hi!
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 01:11:40PM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> In the end, the main question was: does this make the code better on
> architectures other than s390?
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-09/msg00993.html
Yup.
> - Code size decreases in most cases. In general, the ma
