On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:30 PM Kito Cheng wrote:
>
> There is an assertion checking to make sure LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT never
> shrink alignment,
>
> But those two testcase did under x86_64 with -m32, I am not sure if
> the behavior is expected or not?
> It should be fixed on target if that behavio
There is an assertion checking to make sure LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT never
shrink alignment,
But those two testcase did under x86_64 with -m32, I am not sure if
the behavior is expected or not?
It should be fixed on target if that behavior is not expected.
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 8:06 PM Kito Cheng
Ok, I will check.
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 8:04 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 9:20 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
> >
> > Hi Richard:
> >
> > Tested and committed with fixes, thanks your review :)
>
> And we're now hitting
>
> internal compiler error: in execute, at adjust-alignment.
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 9:20 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
>
> Hi Richard:
>
> Tested and committed with fixes, thanks your review :)
And we're now hitting
internal compiler error: in execute, at adjust-alignment.c:73
for
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr69454-2.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386
Hi Richard:
Tested and committed with fixes, thanks your review :)
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 6:22 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:27 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
> >
> > ping
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:53 PM Kito Cheng wrote:
> >>
> >> - The alignment for local variable wa
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:27 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
>
> ping
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:53 PM Kito Cheng wrote:
>>
>> - The alignment for local variable was adjust during
>> estimate_stack_frame_size,
>>however it seems wrong spot to adjust that, expand phase will adjust that
>>but it
ping
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:53 PM Kito Cheng wrote:
> - The alignment for local variable was adjust during
> estimate_stack_frame_size,
>however it seems wrong spot to adjust that, expand phase will adjust
> that
>but it little too late to some gimple optimization, which rely on
> ce
