Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches 于2021年9月2日周四 上午5:28写道：
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 4:22 AM YunQiang Su wrote:
> >
> > Currently, the enums from define_c_enum and define_enum can only
> > has values one by one from 0.
> >
> > In fact we can support the behaviour just like C, aka like
> > (define_e
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 4:22 AM YunQiang Su wrote:
>
> Currently, the enums from define_c_enum and define_enum can only
> has values one by one from 0.
>
> In fact we can support the behaviour just like C, aka like
> (define_enum "mips_isa" [(mips1 1) mips2 (mips32 32) mips32r2]),
> then we can
YunQiang Su writes:
> Currently, the enums from define_c_enum and define_enum can only
> has values one by one from 0.
>
> In fact we can support the behaviour just like C, aka like
> (define_enum "mips_isa" [(mips1 1) mips2 (mips32 32) mips32r2]),
> then we can get
> enum mips_isa {
> MIP
