Hi Segher,
Thanks for your suggestions!
>> + for (unsigned i = 0; i < and_insns.length (); ++i)
>
> "i++" is used more often, is more traditional.
>
Updated.
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr97019.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
>> +/* This issue can only exist on littl
Hi Ke Wen,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:40:38PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> >>* config/rs6000/rs6000-p8swap.c (insn_rtx_pair_t): New type.
> >
> > Please don't do that. The "first" and "second" are completely
> > meaningless. Also, keeping it separate arrays can very well result in
> > better
