On 01/10/2018 04:22 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Ok, so basically we should end up having only two GOARCHes for SH,
being "sh" and "shbe", correct?
Yes, I would like to start there.
If, yes, I can rebase my patch, make the requested changes and resubmit
it to Gerrit.
Thanks!
Done: https://g
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:05 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 01/10/2018 03:51 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> I suppose I shouldn't have said calling convention, as that cuts too
>> finely. There are similar issues with MIPS and even x86 has softfloat
>> variants. Those options are s
On 01/10/2018 03:51 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
I suppose I shouldn't have said calling convention, as that cuts too
finely. There are similar issues with MIPS and even x86 has softfloat
variants. Those options are selectable via command line options in
GCC, and in the gc toolchain they are sel
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 6:30 AM, Oleg Endo wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 06:25 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> Thanks. I finally took a look at this. I don't know much about SH,
>> but I don't think we want to add each SH variant as a separate GOARCH
>> value. As you can see from the list
On 01/10/2018 03:40 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
The main purpose of a GOARCH value is to specify build targets, which
are the +build lines seen in files like
libgo/go/internal/syscall/unix/getrandom_linux_mipsx.go. They also
appear in file names. It seems to me unlikely that it will ever be
nec
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 6:30 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 01/10/2018 03:25 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> Thanks. I finally took a look at this. I don't know much about SH,
>> but I don't think we want to add each SH variant as a separate GOARCH
>> value. As you can see from the
On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 06:25 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> Thanks. I finally took a look at this. I don't know much about SH,
> but I don't think we want to add each SH variant as a separate GOARCH
> value. As you can see from the list you modified in
> ibgo/go/go/build/syslist.go, the diff
On 01/10/2018 03:25 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Thanks. I finally took a look at this. I don't know much about SH,
but I don't think we want to add each SH variant as a separate GOARCH
value. As you can see from the list you modified in
ibgo/go/go/build/syslist.go, the difference between GOARC
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 4:38 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>
> This is the second version of my patch to add support for SuperH
> in libgo. The changes over my first patch in [1] are:
>
> * account for little- and big-endian targets
> * account for sh3- and sh4-specific parameters
>
> I h
