Joseph Myers wrote:
> Another question to consider: what about configurations (mostly
> soft-float) where floating-point exceptions are not supported? (glibc
> wrongly defines math_errhandling to include MATH_ERREXCEPT there, but the
> only option actually permitted by C99 in that case would b
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> I've updated the patch to exclude pre-C99 C/C++/ObjC:
Another question to consider: what about configurations (mostly
soft-float) where floating-point exceptions are not supported? (glibc
wrongly defines math_errhandling to include MATH_ERREXCEPT th
Joseph Myers wrote:
> No existing glibc version defines math_errhandling based on
> __NO_MATH_ERRNO__. I'd expect such a change to come with a glibc patch,
> and indeed a GCC execution test of the value of math_errhandling to make
> sure the compiler's behavior isn't contradicting what's decl
