On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 18:19 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 03:21:49PM -0500, Aaron Sawdey wrote:
> > -toc_relative_expr_p (const_rtx op, bool strict)
> > +toc_relative_expr_p (const_rtx op, bool strict, const_rtx
> > *tocrel_base_ret,
> > + const_rtx *tocr
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 03:21:49PM -0500, Aaron Sawdey wrote:
> > It is probably nicer to have a separate function for
> > toc_relative_expr_p
> > and one to pull the base/offset out. And maybe don't keep it cached
> > for
> > the output function either? It has all info it needs, right, the
> > f
Hi Segher,
On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 18:35 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:43:57AM -0500, Aaron Sawdey wrote:
> > The function toc_relative_expr_p implicitly sets two static vars
> > (tocrel_base and tocrel_offset) that are declared in rs6000.c. The
> > rea
Hi Aaron,
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:43:57AM -0500, Aaron Sawdey wrote:
> The function toc_relative_expr_p implicitly sets two static vars
> (tocrel_base and tocrel_offset) that are declared in rs6000.c. The real
> purpose of this is to communicate between
> print_operand/print_operand_address and
