On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I believe this tests has been wrongly modified previously. It is to test
>>> that the exit check on
>>> pointer shouldn
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I believe this tests has been wrongly modified previously. It is to test
>> that the exit check on
>> pointer shouldn't be replaced by integer IV. Somehow GCC starts replacing
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> I believe this tests has been wrongly modified previously. It is to test
> that the exit check on
> pointer shouldn't be replaced by integer IV. Somehow GCC starts replacing
> the check on
> integer IV with pointer IV. It's valid, thou