On 7/1/25 10:57 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jason Merrill:
On 6/30/25 5:22 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jason Merrill:
On 6/28/25 3:17 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jason Merrill:
Since r10-6069[1] we control the call to __cxa_finalize with
DEFAULT_USE_CXA_ATEXIT, so there's no need to also
* Jason Merrill:
> On 6/30/25 5:22 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Jason Merrill:
>>
>>> On 6/28/25 3:17 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jason Merrill:
> Since r10-6069[1] we control the call to __cxa_finalize with
> DEFAULT_USE_CXA_ATEXIT, so there's no need to also declare it as a
On 6/30/25 5:22 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jason Merrill:
On 6/28/25 3:17 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jason Merrill:
Since r10-6069[1] we control the call to __cxa_finalize with
DEFAULT_USE_CXA_ATEXIT, so there's no need to also declare it as a weak
reference; if the target has __cxa_atexit
* Jason Merrill:
> On 6/28/25 3:17 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Jason Merrill:
>>
>>> Since r10-6069[1] we control the call to __cxa_finalize with
>>> DEFAULT_USE_CXA_ATEXIT, so there's no need to also declare it as a weak
>>> reference; if the target has __cxa_atexit, it must also have __cxa_f
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025, Jason Merrill wrote:
> + if (!flag_use_cxa_atexit != !DEFAULT_USE_CXA_ATEXIT)
> +{
> + const char *opt, *copt;
> + if (flag_use_cxa_atexit)
> + opt = "-fuse-cxa-atexit", copt = "--enable-__cxa_atexit";
> + else
> + opt = "-fno-use-cxa-atexit", copt
On 6/28/25 3:17 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jason Merrill:
Since r10-6069[1] we control the call to __cxa_finalize with
DEFAULT_USE_CXA_ATEXIT, so there's no need to also declare it as a weak
reference; if the target has __cxa_atexit, it must also have __cxa_finalize.
I expect that most targe
* Jason Merrill:
> Since r10-6069[1] we control the call to __cxa_finalize with
> DEFAULT_USE_CXA_ATEXIT, so there's no need to also declare it as a weak
> reference; if the target has __cxa_atexit, it must also have __cxa_finalize.
I expect that most targets do not need __cxa_finalize. They can
