On Wed, 2025-06-11 at 11:57 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 6/3/25 7:02 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Sat, 2025-05-31 at 23:25 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > + if (kind == DK_POP)
> > > + opt += offset;
> >
> > I'm wondering why the offset is applied to "opt" here? That feels
> > wrong
On 6/3/25 7:02 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Sat, 2025-05-31 at 23:25 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
+ if (kind == DK_POP)
+ opt += offset;
I'm wondering why the offset is applied to "opt" here? That feels
wrong to me, or, at least, I couldn't see what it's trying to do, which
got me th
On Sat, 2025-05-31 at 23:25 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> From f57505c7c6fa05a14e285c14a81021655a43ccbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> 2001
> From: Jason Merrill
> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 16:20:52 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] c++: modules and #pragma diagnostic
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>
> To respect the
On 5/29/25 2:57 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Thu, 2025-05-29 at 09:11 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 5/27/25 5:12 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 5/27/25 4:47 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 5/27/25 1:33 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2025-05-23 at 16:58 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/14/25 9:57
On Thu, 2025-05-29 at 09:11 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 5/27/25 5:12 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 5/27/25 4:47 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 5/27/25 1:33 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2025-05-23 at 16:58 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > > On 4/14/25 9:57 AM, Jason Merrill
On 5/27/25 5:12 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 5/27/25 4:47 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 5/27/25 1:33 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2025-05-23 at 16:58 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/14/25 9:57 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 1/9/25 10:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Is
On Tue, 2025-05-27 at 17:21 -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 May 2025, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 27 May 2025, David Malcolm wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2025-05-23 at 16:58 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > On 4/14/25 9:57 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > > On 1/9/25 10:00 PM, J
On Tue, 27 May 2025, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2025, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2025-05-23 at 16:58 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 4/14/25 9:57 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > On 1/9/25 10:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > > Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Is the diagno
On 5/27/25 4:47 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 5/27/25 1:33 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2025-05-23 at 16:58 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/14/25 9:57 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 1/9/25 10:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Is the diagnostic.h change OK for
trunk?
P
On Tue, 27 May 2025, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-05-23 at 16:58 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 4/14/25 9:57 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 1/9/25 10:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Is the diagnostic.h change OK for
> > > > trunk?
> > >
> > > Ping?
>
On 5/27/25 1:33 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2025-05-23 at 16:58 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/14/25 9:57 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 1/9/25 10:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Is the diagnostic.h change OK for
trunk?
Ping?
Ping.
Sorry for the delay in resp
On Fri, 2025-05-23 at 16:58 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 4/14/25 9:57 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 1/9/25 10:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Is the diagnostic.h change OK for
> > > trunk?
> >
> > Ping?
>
> Ping.
Sorry for the delay in responding; comments be
On 4/14/25 9:57 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 1/9/25 10:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Is the diagnostic.h change OK for trunk?
Ping?
Ping.
-- 8< --
To respect the #pragma diagnostic lines in libstdc++ headers when
compiling
with module std, we need to represent
On 1/9/25 10:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Is the diagnostic.h change OK for trunk?
Ping?
-- 8< --
To respect the #pragma diagnostic lines in libstdc++ headers when compiling
with module std, we need to represent them in the module.
I think it's reasonable to make
14 matches
Mail list logo
