On 12/01/2011 10:49 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 12/01/2011 02:59 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
It's essential we don't emit SWP instructions directly into code on any
platform where that code may possibly be run on a later core that has
LDREX/STREX. If we do that we'll end up with a mess that
On 12/01/2011 02:59 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> It's essential we don't emit SWP instructions directly into code on any
> platform where that code may possibly be run on a later core that has
> LDREX/STREX. If we do that we'll end up with a mess that can't be resolved.
Ok. It's easy enough to
Sorry, no.
It's essential we don't emit SWP instructions directly into code on any
platform where that code may possibly be run on a later core that has
LDREX/STREX. If we do that we'll end up with a mess that can't be resolved.
In the absence of known OS helper functions the only solution to t
