On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/10/2016 08:55 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/02/2016 04:26 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 10:06:34PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/10/2016 08:55 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/02/2016 04:26 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 10:06:34PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* cp-array-not
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/02/2016 04:26 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 10:06:34PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
> * cp-array-notation.c (cp_expa
On 01/02/2016 04:26 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 10:06:34PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* cp-array-notation.c (cp_expand_cond_array_notations): Return
error_mark_node only if find_rank failed, not
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 10:06:34PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
>> >gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>> >
>> > * cp-array-notation.c (cp_expand_cond_array_notations): Return
>> > error_mark_node only if find_rank failed, not if it was
>> > successful.
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 10:06:34PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> >gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * cp-array-notation.c (cp_expand_cond_array_notations): Return
> > error_mark_node only if find_rank failed, not if it was
> > successful.
> Can you use -fdump-tree-original in the testcase and verify
On 12/31/2015 08:40 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
The Cilk Plus code may sometimes turn a COND_EXPR into an
error_mark_node for no good reason. This can be seen by compiling the
test case c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/pr60469.c with both gcc and g++ and
observing the differences of the -fdump-tree-origin