On Jun 30, 2011, at 1:21 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 06/29/2011 04:01 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> How many TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_{PRO,EPI}LOGUE targets are left anyway?
>
> Answering the question that it sounds like you actually asked: 2 or 3.
> Not that it does us that much good because of
On 06/29/2011 04:01 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> How many TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_{PRO,EPI}LOGUE targets are left anyway?
Answering the question that it sounds like you actually asked: 2 or 3.
Not that it does us that much good because of the other uses.
FWIW, Alpha appears to be the only target that
On 06/29/2011 04:01 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Can you please also update http://gcc.gnu.org/backends.html? I think
> VAX should have a 'g' after you commit this patch.
Sure.
> How many TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_{PRO,EPI}LOGUE targets are left anyway?
It's difficult to tell at a glance, because quit
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> --- a/gcc/config/vax/vax.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/vax/vax.c
> @@ -70,9 +69,6 @@ static int vax_return_pops_args (tree, tree, int);
> #undef TARGET_ASM_ALIGNED_HI_OP
> #define TARGET_ASM_ALIGNED_HI_OP "\t.word\t"
>
> -#undef TARGET_ASM_FUNC
