On 2021-03-23 09:35, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23/03/21 09:26 -0700, Thiago Macieira via Libstdc++ wrote: On
Tuesday, 23 March 2021 08:39:43 PDT Thomas Rodgers wrote: I will be
submitting a new patch for the
atomic.wait/barrier/latch/semaphore functionality a bit later today
that
subsumes the
On 23/03/21 09:26 -0700, Thiago Macieira via Libstdc++ wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 March 2021 08:39:43 PDT Thomas Rodgers wrote:
I will be submitting a new patch for the
atomic.wait/barrier/latch/semaphore functionality a bit later today that
subsumes the changes to atomic_wait and latch, and includes
On Tuesday, 23 March 2021 08:39:43 PDT Thomas Rodgers wrote:
> I will be submitting a new patch for the
> atomic.wait/barrier/latch/semaphore functionality a bit later today that
> subsumes the changes to atomic_wait and latch, and includes the changes
> to barrier.
Thanks, Thomas
Is that meant t
On 2021-03-22 08:29, Thiago Macieira via Libstdc++ wrote:
Discussion at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2021-February/052043.html
This patch set includes the uncontroversial parts that improve
performance but don't otherwise change ABI.
Please note we still need to decide on how to de
