Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Fix ICE of vect cost related to V1TI [PR102767]

2021-10-27 Thread Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches
on 2021/10/28 上午9:43, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 9:30 PM Kewen.Lin wrote: >> >> Hi David, >> >> Thanks for the review! >> >> on 2021/10/27 下午9:12, David Edelsohn wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:04 PM Kewen.Lin wrote: Hi, As PR102767 shows, the commit

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Fix ICE of vect cost related to V1TI [PR102767]

2021-10-27 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 9:30 PM Kewen.Lin wrote: > > Hi David, > > Thanks for the review! > > on 2021/10/27 下午9:12, David Edelsohn wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:04 PM Kewen.Lin wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> As PR102767 shows, the commit r12-3482 exposed one ICE in function > >> rs6000_bu

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Fix ICE of vect cost related to V1TI [PR102767]

2021-10-27 Thread Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches
Hi David, Thanks for the review! on 2021/10/27 下午9:12, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:04 PM Kewen.Lin wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> As PR102767 shows, the commit r12-3482 exposed one ICE in function >> rs6000_builtin_vectorization_cost. We claims V1TI supports movmisalign >> on rs6

Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Fix ICE of vect cost related to V1TI [PR102767]

2021-10-27 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:04 PM Kewen.Lin wrote: > > Hi, > > As PR102767 shows, the commit r12-3482 exposed one ICE in function > rs6000_builtin_vectorization_cost. We claims V1TI supports movmisalign > on rs6000 (See define_expand "movmisalign"), so it return true in > rs6000_builtin_support_ve