Re: [PATCH] minor optimization bug in basic_string move assignment

2023-02-04 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023, 13:12 François Dumont via Libstdc++, < libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > On 03/02/23 15:50, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 18:38, François Dumont > wrote: > >> Let's submit a proper patch proposal then. > >> > >> The occasion for me to ask if there is any reas

Re: [PATCH] minor optimization bug in basic_string move assignment

2023-02-04 Thread François Dumont via Gcc-patches
On 03/02/23 15:50, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 18:38, François Dumont wrote: Let's submit a proper patch proposal then. The occasion for me to ask if there is any reason for cow string not being C++11 allocator compliant ? Just lack of interest ? Mostly lack of interest, but

Re: [PATCH] minor optimization bug in basic_string move assignment

2023-02-03 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 18:38, François Dumont wrote: > > Let's submit a proper patch proposal then. > > The occasion for me to ask if there is any reason for cow string not > being C++11 allocator compliant ? Just lack of interest ? Mostly lack of interest, but also I don't really want to "encour