On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 05:40, François Dumont via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> Just forget about this patch, bad idea.
>
> The key_type might have additional data not used for the comparison.
> This data would not be preserved if we were inserting the already stored
> equivalent key instead of the user pro
Just forget about this patch, bad idea.
The key_type might have additional data not used for the comparison.
This data would not be preserved if we were inserting the already stored
equivalent key instead of the user provided.
On 22/02/23 07:08, François Dumont wrote:
This one is a refineme
