Hi!
25.02.2020 13:36, Roman Zhuykov wrote:
> So, IMHO the best next step is to improve the behavior rather then docs :)
I want to add one more point into this discussion. I have recently
decided to test some stuff on old branches, e.q gcc-4.9, 5 and 6.
On modern systems there are some issues wi
Hi, Jakub!
Jakub Jelinek writes:
>> +When the option is not specified, the active set of checks depends on
>> context.
>> +Namely, bootstrap stage 1 defaults to @samp{--enable-checking=yes}, builds
>> +from release archives default to @samp{--enable-checking=release}, and
> Is archives the right w
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 01:36:13PM +0300, Roman Zhuykov wrote:
> Not sure how to formulate it better, just "builds from release branch or
> release archives default to ..." ?
"from a release branch or" or "from release branches or", otherwise LGTM.
Jakub
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 11:20:58AM +0300, Roman Zhuykov wrote:
> Sandra and Richard, thank you for review!
>
> Since 'types' checks are included into 'yes' and I addressed all other
> hints, I have pushed updated patch as r10-6832.
>
> Jakub, Richard B, can I apply it to 8 and 9 ?
Yes.
> +When
Hi all!
22.02.2020 6:25, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 2/11/20 7:46 AM, Roman Zhuykov wrote:
>> Since I have to ask again about backports, I've decided to make few more
>> steps and with Alexander's help created new patch which rewords the
>> whole option description and covers items (3), (4) and (
On 2/11/20 7:46 AM, Roman Zhuykov wrote:
[snip]
Since I have to ask again about backports, I've decided to make few more
steps and with Alexander's help created new patch which rewords the
whole option description and covers items (3), (4) and (8). CCing Jakub
and Richard as release managers, al
Ping. Proposed patch is docs-only (install.texi), and IMHO it's better
to push it into 8.4 and 9.3.
11.02.2020 17:46, Roman Zhuykov wrote:
> 07.02.2020 20:20, Richard Sandiford writes:
>> Roman Zhuykov writes:
>>> Hi!
>>> I've investigated a bit, because some of the following confused me while
07.02.2020 20:20, Richard Sandiford writes:
> Roman Zhuykov writes:
>> Hi!
>> I've investigated a bit, because some of the following confused me while
>> working with some local 9.2-based branch.
>>
>> Documentation issues:
>> (0) See patch for install.texi at the bottom, two possible values are
Roman Zhuykov writes:
> Hi!
> I've investigated a bit, because some of the following confused me while
> working with some local 9.2-based branch.
>
> Documentation issues:
> (0) See patch for install.texi at the bottom, two possible values are
> not documented. Ok for master? Backports?
> (1) F
Ping with CCing Jeff and Joseph.
I think patch is rather obvious, but hopefully other items will also get
some attention.
29.01.2020 16:32, Roman Zhuykov wrote:
> Hi!
> I've investigated a bit, because some of the following confused me
> while working with some local 9.2-based branch.
>
> Documen
10 matches
Mail list logo
