On 01/14/2017 10:11 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 09:23:45PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
But isn't this a backend failing? ISTM that gen_cond_trap just calls
standard expansion routines and they should either have generated a
valid sequence or NULL.
What in particular genera
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 09:23:45PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> But isn't this a backend failing? ISTM that gen_cond_trap just calls
> standard expansion routines and they should either have generated a
> valid sequence or NULL.
>
> What in particular generated insn 64 and shouldn't it instead have
On 01/14/2017 06:55 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
As shown in the PR, ifcvt will happily make invalid insns when given the
chance. This patch teaches it some manners.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-linux. Is this okay for trunk?
Segher
2017-01-15 Segher Boessenkool
PR rtl
