On Fri, 4 Jun 2021, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 04:06:43PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On June 4, 2021 10:44:42 AM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek
> > wrote:
> > >Hi!
> > >
> > >The callers of fold_read_from_vector expect that the index they pass is
> > >an index of an element i
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 04:21:41PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> but if the permutation was e.g.
> { 0, 13, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 }
> then it would be called with 5 as index and it could see that
> it is in the second half (aka. the { 0, 0, 0, 0 } constructor) and
> read the 5-4 element from there.
Not
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 04:06:43PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On June 4, 2021 10:44:42 AM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >The callers of fold_read_from_vector expect that the index they pass is
> >an index of an element in the vector and the function does that most of
> >the
> >t
On June 4, 2021 10:44:42 AM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>The callers of fold_read_from_vector expect that the index they pass is
>an index of an element in the vector and the function does that most of
>the
>time. But we allow CONSTRUCTORs with VECTOR_TYPE to have VECTOR_TYPE
>elements
