On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:47:10PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > So the patch below makes it so that if HOST_WIDE_INT is wide enough then,
> > depending on whether the range type is signed or not, add_AT_unsigned or
> > add_AT_int is used. This is more efficient for small ranges. And makes it
> >
> So the patch below makes it so that if HOST_WIDE_INT is wide enough then,
> depending on whether the range type is signed or not, add_AT_unsigned or
> add_AT_int is used. This is more efficient for small ranges. And makes it
> so that the value can be deduced from the DW_FORM by the consumer (whi
