On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 11:00 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> > Note there's also array_slice<> which could be used to pass non-const
> > vec<>s that are never resized but modified - the only "valid" case of
> > passing a non-const vec<> by value.
>
> Yeah
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 30 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 3:46 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
>> On 6/29/21 4:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
[...]
>> >
>> > But I wonder if since you now identified them they could be massaged
>> > prior to doing the change.
>> >
>> > I do hope we end up no
Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> Note there's also array_slice<> which could be used to pass non-const
> vec<>s that are never resized but modified - the only "valid" case of
> passing a non-const vec<> by value.
Yeah. We'd need a new constructor for that (the current one only
takes cons
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 3:46 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 6/29/21 4:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 8:07 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/28/21 2:07 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:36 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 6/25/21 4:11 P
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 7:18 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 6/29/21 8:43 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 6/28/21 2:07 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >> On 6/28/21 2:07 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:36 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 6/25/21 4:11 PM, Jason Merrill wr
On 6/29/21 4:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 8:07 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/28/21 2:07 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:36 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:38 PM,
On 6/29/21 8:43 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/28/21 2:07 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/28/21 2:07 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:36 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill
On 6/28/21 2:07 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/28/21 2:07 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:36 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor wr
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 02:51:58PM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > > On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > > > On 4/27/21 8:0
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 29 2021, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 8:07 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
[...]
>>
>> vNULL can bind to a const vec& (via the vec conversion ctor) but
>> not to vec&. The three functions that in the patch are passed
>> vNULL modify the argument when i
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 8:07 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 6/28/21 2:07 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:36 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/25/21 4:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >>> On 6/25/21 4:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote
On 6/28/21 2:07 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:36 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill w
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:36 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 6/25/21 4:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 6/25/21 4:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >> On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >>> On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 4/27/21
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:52 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >> On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >>> On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener
On 6/25/21 4:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Ma
On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/27/21 1:58 AM,
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 5:26 AM Trevor Saunders wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:34:26PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 6/7/21 2:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:29 AM Trevor Saunders
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Martin
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:34:26PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 6/7/21 2:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:29 AM Trevor Saunders
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 6/2/21 12:55 AM, Ric
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 04:17:09PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 6/3/21 2:29 AM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > > On 6/2/21 12:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:56 PM Martin Sebor wrote
On 6/3/21 2:29 AM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 6/2/21 12:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:56 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via
On 6/7/21 2:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:29 AM Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 6/2/21 12:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:56 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Ja
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 12:33 PM Trevor Saunders wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 10:51:18AM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:29 AM Trevor Saunders
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> > > w
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 10:51:18AM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:29 AM Trevor Saunders wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > > On 6/2/21 12:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 1,
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:29 AM Trevor Saunders wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On 6/2/21 12:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:56 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 6/2/21 12:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:56 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
> > >
> > > On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
On 6/2/21 12:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:56 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:56 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >> On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 4/27/21 1:58 AM, R
On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/27/21 1:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/27/21 1:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:46 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patc
On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/27/21 1:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:46 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
PR 90904 notes that auto_vec
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/27/21 1:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:46 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
PR 90904 notes that auto_vec is unsafe to copy and assign because
the class manages it
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 4/27/21 1:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:46 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> PR 90904 notes that auto_vec is unsafe to copy and assign because
> >> the class manages its own memory but doesn
On 4/27/21 1:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:46 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
PR 90904 notes that auto_vec is unsafe to copy and assign because
the class manages its own memory but doesn't define (or delete)
either special function. Since I first ran into the p
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:46 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> PR 90904 notes that auto_vec is unsafe to copy and assign because
> the class manages its own memory but doesn't define (or delete)
> either special function. Since I first ran into the problem,
> auto_vec has grown a move ct
35 matches
Mail list logo
