On 2/26/19 6:32 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Please disregard the original patch and consider the attached
> version instead.
>
> On 2/26/19 5:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> The false positive in PR89350 is due to -Wstringop-overflow
>> trusting that the sizetype offset in POINTER_PLUS_EXPR means
>> t
Please disregard the original patch and consider the attached
version instead.
On 2/26/19 5:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The false positive in PR89350 is due to -Wstringop-overflow
trusting that the sizetype offset in POINTER_PLUS_EXPR means
the offset is, in fact, unsigned. Avoiding the false po
