On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 1:34 AM Vit Kabele wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 04:05:17PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000..e8f1044a36b
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wpadded.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > > +/* { dg
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 04:05:17PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..e8f1044a36b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wpadded.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-Wpadded" } */
> > +
> > +/*
>
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 6:50 AM Vit Kabele wrote:
>
> I fixed the formatting and added the test.
>
> The test has first element 32bit so that it should work on both 32 and
> 64bit architectures, even without the aligned attribute.
>
> If there is some better way how to write the test properly form
I fixed the formatting and added the test.
The test has first element 32bit so that it should work on both 32 and
64bit architectures, even without the aligned attribute.
If there is some better way how to write the test properly formatted
(i.e. not on a single line), please let me know.
-- >8 -
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 09:37:32PM +0200, Vit Kabele wrote:
> When the compiler warns about padding struct to alignment boundary, it
> now also informs the user about the size of the alignment that needs to
> be added to get rid of the warning.
>
> This removes the need of using pahole or similar
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 3:37 PM Vit Kabele wrote:
>
> When the compiler warns about padding struct to alignment boundary, it
> now also informs the user about the size of the alignment that needs to
> be added to get rid of the warning.
Hi, thanks for taking the time to improve -Wpadded; I have b
